|Author:||Jack, Andrew/ Kennedy, David|
|Housing's Bottom Rung: Single Room Occupancy Hotels in San Diego (A) (4pp)||C18-95-1293.0|
|Part B (6pp+)||C18-95-1294.0|
When the destruction or conversion of single-room occupancy hotels, or SROs, in San Diego's downtown seemed to lead to an increase in homelessness, a private real estate developer argued that he could build profitable new SROs if the city would waive or modify key safety and construction standards. In the ensuing debate over the first such SRO, the Baltic Inn, core public housing issues came to the fore: whether regulation was effective and equitable, whether deregulation would serve the poor, and what minimum quality of life society should demand for even the poorest housing consumers. For a different treatment of this issue, see Housing's Bottom Rung: Single Room Occupancy Hotels in San Diego (C18-95-1293.0 and 1294.0).Housing's Bottom Rung, the abridged version of Building the Baltic (C16-89-928.0), leaves the dilemma of how best to solve the city's housing problems to students, rather than describing the route which San Diego actually pursued, as is done in the original case. It describes the decline in single room occupancy hotels for poor single people and early proposals for a preservation ordinance to halt their demolition. The use of the A case first in class, followed by the handout of B, is meant to prompt the realization that careful and imaginative policy analysis can lead in politically unanticipated directions.
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
This is a working document. Please send your comments and suggestions to:
Case Program Sales Office <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Telephone: 617/495-9523 || Fax: 617/495-8878